** MEXICO [and non]. I wanted to include the city-to-city distances for my June
23-24 logs, but that would have delayed the report even further. Now I have
looked them up from http://www.distancefromto.net/
with km and miles; and also take the opportunity to offer a summary of the
logs, not including ones which were not certain enough:
90.7, XHOY,
Guadalajara, Jal. 1831 1138
88.1, XHZN, Zamora,
Mich. 1876 1166
92.7, XHRTA, Aguascalientes, Ags.
1671 1038
93.1, XHEI, San Luís Potosí, SLP 1613 1002
95.5,
XHRO, Zapopan, Jal. 1831 1138
97.7, XHSNP, San Luís Potosí,
SLP 1613 1002
99.5, XHLS, Guadalajara, Jal. 1831
1138
93.5, XHLAZ, Ciudad Guzmán, Jal. 1937 1204
90.1, XHTGO,
Tlaltenango, Zac. 1548 962
97.5, XHPQ, León,
Gto. 1740 1081
95.1, XHEL, Fresnillo,
Zac. 1548 962
96.5, XHZER, Guadalupe, Zac.
1584 984
104.3, XHUDG, Guadalajara, Jal. 1831 1138
102.1,
XHESL, San Luís Potosí, SLP 1613 1002
100.1, XHSE, Acapulco de
Juárez, Gro. 2183 1357
96.3, XEJB, Tlaquepaque, Jal. 1832
1138
88.7, XHJX, Querétaro, Qro. 1776 1104
101.7, XHEMM,
Morelia, Mich. 1886 1172
93.5, XHNY, Irapuato,
Gto. 1782 1107
95.1, XHNH, Irapuato, Gto.
1782 1107
105.9, XHQJ, Guadalajara, Jal. 1831 1138
90.7,
XHJRZ, Jerez de García Salinas, Zac. 1608 999
90.3, XHQS, Fresnillo,
Zac. 1548 962
93.5, XHQC, Saltillo, Coah.
1257 781
100.9, XHCAA, Aguascalientes, Ags. 1671 1038
93.3,
XHEHZ, Zacatecas, Zac. 1583 984
97.1, XHQB, Tulancingo,
Hgo. 1816 1129
88.1, XHRED, México, DF
1913 1189
90.1, XHRYS, Reynosa-Matamoros, Tamps. 1149 713,
1172 728
90.1, XHMU,
Tampico, Tamps. 1577 980
93.5, XHQC, Saltillo,
Coah. 1257 781
95.3, XHOX, Tampico, Tamps.
1577 980
95.3, XHLRS, Villagrán, Tamps. 1336 830
96.5,
XHMSN, Cadereyta, N.L. 1221 758
96.5, XHZER, Zacatecas,
Zac. 1583 984
97.7, XHSNP, San Luís Potosí, SLP 1613
1002
101.3, XHAW, Monterrey, N.L. 1214 755
106.1, XHITS,
Monterrey, N.L. 1214 755
99.3, XHHHI, Hidalgo del Parral,
Chih. 1285 799
97.1, XHPE, Torreón, Coah. 1318 819
97.3, XHZR, Zaragoza, Coah. 925 575
99.3, XHJL,
Guamúchil, Sin. 1557 967
88.3, KNAI, Phœnix
AZ 1335 830
88.3, KBNR, Brownsville
TX 1169 726
90.3, KEDT, Corpus Christi TX
958 595
92.1, KZUA, Holbrook AZ 1122 697
104.3,
KEZP, Bunkie LA 803 499
97.7, WTGN, Lima
OH 1291 802
97.3, WMNX, Wilmington
NC 1824 1133
About my method of DXing and reporting: my
objective is not to rack up station totals; indeed I have no idea what they
would be in some 60 years of DXing. Sorry, but my eyes glaze over seeing long
lists of logs, one-liners with no or minimal details, tho they save a lot of
space in printed bulletins. And is it really of interest to anyone but the
logger, whether an item is NEW or not? I recall that a few of mine this day were
logged previously, but don`t keep track with any tally.
Instead, I enjoy
learning more and more about geography, culture, business, radio station
practices, language, etc., etc. – each log a potential learning experience; and
often the subsequent challenge of figuring out an ID from clues logged. So the
more detail the better. Also, my observations can be added to database info
where lacking.
I long ago quit actively collecting QSLs, so these details
are not to convince a station I heard them. But SHAME upon anyone who would use
my details to garner undeserved QSLs, pretending they actually DXed the
stations. I feel this is hardly a real problem since most of the stations could
be ``pretend-DXed`` on webcasts now anyway, if one is really so dishonest (Glenn
Hauser, OK, DX LISTENING DIGEST)
